How is calling the man responsible for this fiasco a “Good conservative” during shoes on immigration repudiating him?
Serious question. Logic dictates that is supporting him. Repudiating him would be telling the truth and saying conservativim has no place for coddling illegal immigrants or the people pushing for it.
Am I wrong here? How so?
Edit “Shows”
>> repudiating him?
Not him, but his views; i.e., “repudiation of Rubio’s positions on immigration”
>> Am I wrong here? How so?
You’re not wrong. You’re pinning the policy to the man that’s making the decision to facilitate amnesty. It’s a value judgement on his character. And it’s his character that could help destroy the Country. And logic demands the inquiry: Why not castigate the type of individual that’s willing to destroy the Country? I get it.