Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper; Gen.Blather
In the last two months, in all the Lunch-n-Learn trainings I've gone to, the EEOC has been warning that they were just waiting for the perfect test case to take this background check idea to court.

They put out a discussion idea about not asking about backgrounds until the second or third interview, and if a candidate has a background to take a solid look "one more time" before deciding against a particilar candidate.

They've been salivating to get their hands on a disparate impact case caused by background checks.

I loathe the EEOC.

39 posted on 06/12/2013 10:58:13 AM PDT by RikaStrom ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RikaStrom

” not asking about backgrounds until the second or third interview, and if a candidate has a background to take a solid look “one more time” before deciding against a particilar candidate. “

Interviews are all about eliminating the unsuitable candidates as early as possible. I think that most ex-con’s will fall into the category of one interview only. Can you deliver appliances to people’s homes or not? The most important thing about hiring this guy, is not accepting somebody who will endanger your customers and result in a lawsuit. In a book on how to not be a victim a former robber said, “My job was to deliver stuff. I’d ask to use your bathroom and then unlock a window.”


44 posted on 06/12/2013 11:25:52 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson