Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyber Liberty

Could you clarify?


37 posted on 06/12/2013 9:24:50 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: ArmstedFragg

On appeal, Zimmerman won the right to get a deposition from Crump, the “Martin family attorney” who had butted into the case by getting the interview with “witness Eight,” AKA “DeeDee.”

There is a lot of trouble with the contents of that interview, not the least of which is the lack of cross-examination of the witness. As things stand today, that “testimony” is damaging to Zimmerman with no way to rebut any of it. The next-best thing is to get the attorney responsible for the interview into sworn testimony.

Nelson denied it, and she was beaten on appeal. She has to allow the depo, but she’s stalling it until after the trial so it won’t make a difference in the kangaroo court. She’s rushing this into trial, skipping some very important steps in the process. They hadn’t even finished taking testimony about the expert witnesses.


47 posted on 06/12/2013 9:48:43 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson