Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hugh the Scot
I understand the methodology. It’s still unconstitutional.

Well, I believe that Medicare is unconstitutional, far more unconstitutional than the warehousing of phone records.

The courts disagree with us.

214 posted on 06/11/2013 7:36:14 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: Tau Food

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

I’m not aware of the “court” decision you reference which renders this obsolete.

The courts haven’t heard it. Because it was a seekrit.

Tell me, where do YOU think government derives it’s power to act?


224 posted on 06/11/2013 7:41:58 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson