[DannyTN]

"Interesting thought: how did the powers that be behind Democrats Obama and Clinton just happen to pull this guy out of hat for his totally obscure video and make him the fall guy for Benghazi?"

It does make you wonder. Possibilities..

• They went searching for inflammatory material to Islam prior to Benghazi for another project that they were going to blame on him.
• They went searching for inflammatory material to Islam after Benghazi to blame it on him.
• They were going to use the video for a false flag operation other than Benghazi.
• Perhaps someone had actually complained about the video to the state department in hopes that State would suppress free speech and thus making State aware of the video.
• Huma checked with Al Quaida and Al Quaida suggested blaming that guy.

[gaijin]

He was an FBI asset before the Bengazi attack, and it’s likely he was dredged up and thrust onto the scene after the Bengazi attack, specifically because they had leverage on him. He could easily be used as a blame recipient.

I think that this latest much-vaunted innocence declaration by him represents him CONTINUING to act as asset;

This latest “cri de coeur” role by him as “wronged party” has the actual objective of distracting from his real role as FBI asset and **part** of the Bengazi coverup:

They offered to go easy on him if he played/plays ball.

It was role-playing and obfuscation before, and it is exactly that NOW also.