Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EXCH54FE
Are you saying that a vote for amnesty...

No. I'm saying that if someone even hints that someone might want to do something in relation to fixing our screwed up border situation then suddenly a bunch of you run around saying *insert elected target* are for a blanket amnesty despite them saying no such damn thing.

Get a grip.

47 posted on 06/10/2013 1:56:16 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse

Sorry,

But he did support amnesty and amnesty is what this bill is all about.

Quote from the article:

“Paul, who has hinted at an interest in running for president in 2016, in March backed the concept of a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants that is at the heart of a comprehensive immigration bill under consideration in the U.S. Senate.”

He may back off this stand and if he does back off and votes NO on this bill I will still support him. Otherwise...


51 posted on 06/10/2013 2:05:44 PM PDT by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse

It’s a bad bill, DC. Rand Paul should be absolutely inflamed against ANY 1000 page bill.

The devil is always in the details.

Imagine what a lawyer can do with a single clause, and then expand that into the exponential stratosphere.


52 posted on 06/10/2013 2:06:03 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson