To: pabianice
Way back in the WWI period the US admitted a large number of Syrian Christian refugees. They were successfully assimilated. We can probably do that with the rest of the Christians.
It would not be wise to admit any Sunni ~
5 posted on
06/10/2013 10:57:25 AM PDT by
muawiyah
(Git yer Red Arm Bands here - $29.95 - NOT SOLD IN STORES - TAX FREE)
To: muawiyah
The refugee status should be made contingent upon known religious affiliation.
Sons of Islam are expressly forbidden to enter the United States. We got WAY too many of those already, we need no more for “ethnic balance”.
19 posted on
06/10/2013 11:00:50 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(When did the government suddenly become our psycho ex-girlfriend? - Jay Leno)
To: muawiyah
It would not be wise to admit any Sunni ~
34 posted on
06/10/2013 11:09:14 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: muawiyah
It would not be wise to admit any Sunni ~ Or shia, or any other form of mohammedan.
35 posted on
06/10/2013 11:09:23 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: muawiyah
Obama will keep out the Christians and fast track all his al Qaeda buddies.
81 posted on
06/10/2013 11:52:36 AM PDT by
Argus
To: muawiyah
Way back in the WWI period the US admitted a large number of Syrian Christian refugees. They were successfully assimilated. We can probably do that with the rest of the Christians.
I’ve known some of the descendents of these people, BIGGEST DAMN libs, I’ve ever know and the word tolerant only works in their direction.
So no I’m not in favor of any more immigration. It may seem cruel but a lifetime of experience leads me to that conclusion.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson