Skip to comments.
“Top Secret” Should Mean Just That [CFR op-ed on PRISM]
Council on Foreign Relations ^
| 6/6/2013
| Max Boot
Posted on 06/07/2013 12:06:34 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Just thought I'd spin by CFR's website and see if they weighed in on PRISM. I wondered, just what would the financial oligarchy want CFR to relay to Washington politicians and bureaucrats regarding the mainstream disclosure of their secret toy ?
I admit that I did expect to find some globalist whining about the outing of their precious "opposition identification" system, seeing as how they had the US taxpayer probably spend billions on it, which could have been spent on some other globalist program - and I was not dissappointed.
CFR reprinted this op-ed that was originally published in Commentary Magazine by
Max Boot.
Max is the stereotypical Harvard-indoctrinated, Russian-born operative planted within the ranks of globalism's conservative operation.
To: PieterCasparzen
He needs to be ferreted out and prosecuted.Yeah, let's ignore the gross Constitutional violations committed by the government and go after the whisteblower. The ol' Beltway two-step when they are caught red-handed.
2
posted on
06/07/2013 12:08:21 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: PieterCasparzen
"If once the people become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, Judges and Governors, shall all become wolves. It seems to be the law of our general nature...."
To: loveliberty2
The quotation in previous post is, of course, Thomas Jefferson’s.
To: PieterCasparzen
Pretty amazing.
If this isn’t proof they all ride in the same limos I’m not sure what is.
To: LibLieSlayer
To: PieterCasparzen
PRISM justs sounds like something straight out of the Matrix movies.
We are so through as a civilization and as a democracy.
7
posted on
06/07/2013 12:16:36 PM PDT
by
grania
To: PieterCasparzen
Ignore that man behind the curtain . . . .
8
posted on
06/07/2013 12:16:59 PM PDT
by
dagogo redux
(A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
To: PieterCasparzen
Talking to your superiors?
Sometimes that is not an option, as they are the problem.
Sometimes you can’t even go around them to even superior superiors, as they are disinterested or would send sh*t rolling back down hill through the CoC onto you.
Blowing the whistle on management folly ain’t easy.
To: Black Agnes
Good people under evil orders have had enough and are leaking the truth to try and save the Republic... I feel it in my bones.
LLS
10
posted on
06/07/2013 12:19:23 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: PieterCasparzen
I have no idea who this intelligence officer is, but he (or she) has committed a serious crime by the unauthorized disclosure of such sensitive information. He needs to be ferreted out and prosecuted. Just like the Benghazi and IRS whistleblowers, Max?
11
posted on
06/07/2013 12:24:06 PM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: LibLieSlayer
We can hope so. We surely can.
To: PieterCasparzen
so the Verizon/PRISM scandal will result in more snooping around in phone records of journalists, and the cycle will repeat once again
To: PieterCasparzen
14
posted on
06/07/2013 12:42:40 PM PDT
by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
To: mbarker12474
Ultimately, the whistle blower did talk to his or her superior: The People.
15
posted on
06/07/2013 12:45:47 PM PDT
by
Psycho_Bunny
(Thought Puzzle: Describe Islam without using the phrase "mental disorder" more than four times.)
To: Psycho_Bunny
16
posted on
06/07/2013 12:48:47 PM PDT
by
PieterCasparzen
(We have to fix things ourselves)
To: grania
We are so through as a civilization and as a democracy. Screw Democracy, I want a Republic!
17
posted on
06/07/2013 12:52:15 PM PDT
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: PieterCasparzen
“Instead this appears to be another legal and authorized program that has been implemented by our elected leaders to protect us against terrorists.”
If it was legal and authorized, we would not be hearing about it now, and Congress and Senate members would not be just learning about it. It would not even be a leak because we could read the law that specified what they are doing.
18
posted on
06/07/2013 12:53:35 PM PDT
by
unlearner
(You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
To: PieterCasparzen
My, how things have changed...
To: Black Agnes
20
posted on
06/07/2013 1:04:12 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson