Replies

The thing folks don’t understand is the connection between the intelligence services and the world “financial oligarchy”.

If you don’t know who’s really behind the curtain directing what’s going on, you’re simply fighting a front.

The CIA was founded by Wall Street operatives who were part of its globalist espionage efforts for decades prior to their careers at CIA and State.

Look up the Dulles brothers, read all about them.

The top level of CIA works for globalists, always has, always will.

It makes no sense to have intelligence services - whose mandate is “national security” - to be outside the chain of command of the military. IMHO, intelligence services present much more of an opportunity for giving up military secrets than providing the military with reliable information on foreign militaries, since the stock-in-trade of intelligence services is spies, and they themselves are riddled with double agents. It only takes one double agent in the right place to lose a tremendous amount of information. And the military has no control of information once the CIA has it; they only can control information that is kept exclusively inside the military.

So we have a supposedly civilian organization which has the opportunity to completely fabricate reports to Congressional oversight committees, since the committees have no alternate means of verifying what they are told.

Which is not hard for them to accept, because members of Congress are backed by the same globalists. They rely on organizations like CFR for their view of foreign policy and the world diplomatic and geopolitical scene. So if CIA briefs a Congressional Intelligence oversight committee and provides evidence that the leader of nation X is a threat and must be overthrown, and the evidence looks reasonable - most of the committee members will undoubtedly accept this as fact, and give the CIA leadership whatever authorizations it requests. Without a doubt, organizations like CFR will already be cranking out articles casting the leader of nation X in a bad light, and the “secret briefing” will simply be confirming the Congressmen’s suspicions.

And there we have it - a President has the military on one hand, and the State Dept and civilian intelligence agencies on the other. Military Flag Officers are gently brought on board with globalism via relationships with defense “experts” at CFR, think tanks, contractors, universities, etc., but they undoubtedly have very little idea of what transpires between those people and State/CIA. Any such officers that buck the system can simply be retired.

A President is simply handed a few carefully engineered options and a recommendation that basically relays what the financial oligarchy wishes to happen.

Once you get outside of the White House, there is no logging of who said what to whom - where the advice came from or how it was developed.

The CIA only releases tiny carefully engineered statements to the public about what it tells the President and how it arrived at its recommendations, with such pronouncements inherently limited because of “national security” concerns. There is nothing preventing the relationships top CIA people have in the academic, business and diplomatic worlds from being used in secret, providing leaders in those spheres with virtually unlimited influence on our intelligence services.

It’s ALL linked to the Globalist Agenda....so I have no problem agreeing with you.

Once you begin to monitor and watch the International movements..of nations and leaders...and who they see...when they see them etc. It’s pretty obvious the politicians are operating on a completely ‘other’ level then the concerns for the peoples of those nations.

They are all positioning themselves and their nations revenues and resources on the BIG Game-board their playing on....the more each has and what they will bring to the Global table will depend on the positions they will hold when Global Governance is set to go.......we are simply the revenue and the pawns they barter with.

It makes no sense to have intelligence services - whose mandate is “national security” - to be outside the chain of command of the military.

You bet and spending the American treasure overseas fighting compassionate decades long wars where the cash cargo's of C17s, pallets stacked in cash, disappeared...

National security? Who's kidding whom?

During Bush's reign, during war time, tens of millions entered the U.S. illegally and were given cash, prizes and gifts...Those who brought down the towers in 911 were invited in...After 911 more Muslims were allowed in than the previous two decades...The foreign terrorist who blew up the Boston Marathon, were given hundreds of thousands in gifts, prizes and tax dollars by the government.

National security?