I was STUNNED by his answer, and by Kirk asking the questions. WOW!!! I watched it live and was shocked it was not being covered.
1 posted on
06/06/2013 9:34:44 AM PDT by
PghBaldy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: PghBaldy
The fact that Holder refused to say 'no' was the same as taking the 5th in my opinion.
Very shocking.
To: PghBaldy
Holder assured Kirk that there is no intention to do anything of that nature that is, to spy on Members of Congress or to spy on the Supreme Court.In other words, they are doing just that.
3 posted on
06/06/2013 9:38:10 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: PghBaldy
With all due respect, Senator, I dont think this is an appropriate setting for me to discuss [this issue],
Wow.
4 posted on
06/06/2013 9:38:16 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: PghBaldy
Of course they are - and clearly, they have the goods on Boehner, McCain, Graham, and their ilk.
5 posted on
06/06/2013 9:39:34 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
(CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
To: maggief
that is, to spy on Members of Congress or to spy on the “Supreme Court.
Why did he add the court? Roberts explained?
6 posted on
06/06/2013 9:40:20 AM PDT by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: PghBaldy
Weasel words from Holder. The short answer is clearly YES, or else why would he parse?
8 posted on
06/06/2013 9:42:11 AM PDT by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: PghBaldy
10 posted on
06/06/2013 9:42:53 AM PDT by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(President Obma; The Slumlord of the Rentseekers)
To: PghBaldy
Did a Senator or House Rep. say there was a ‘bug’ in the cloakroom? I don’t think he was kidding. You can bet team 0bama was spying on John Roberts like crazy leading up to his 0bamacare decision. Probably got some incriminating bathhouse photos.
To: PghBaldy
Barrock, help, I need executive privelige again, fast.
13 posted on
06/06/2013 9:45:09 AM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
(ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
To: PghBaldy
The answer was was meant to intimidate and to plant fear. Holder was saying that you, Congress and SCOTUS, are being watched and any information we have on you can be used any way we want.
14 posted on
06/06/2013 9:45:10 AM PDT by
kabar
To: PghBaldy
The palace coup is upon is complete an nobody noticed.
To: PghBaldy
17 posted on
06/06/2013 9:46:37 AM PDT by
txmissy
To: PghBaldy
We all know very well the Obozo and Holder ARE SPYING on both Congress and SCOTUS. We do not need proof - the very proof is in the Admin’s pattern of unaccountable behavior over the past 5 years, which has accelerated since the 2nd term commenced.
19 posted on
06/06/2013 9:47:15 AM PDT by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: PghBaldy
Holder assured Kirk that there is no intention to do anything of that nature He should have added *But if it happens, it happens*.
Carefully chosen weasel words and note, he used the word "is" and not was.
Interesting the choice of "is".
20 posted on
06/06/2013 9:47:23 AM PDT by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Trey Gowdy......Nuff said.)
To: PghBaldy
Depends on what the definition os “spy” is now isn`t it?
There can be no law when the extreme totalitarian left redefine words to suit their ends and means at any particular time and place.
Holder isn`t spying, he may be surveilling , or monitoring, or recording called numbers, but he isn`t a “spy” .
Until the dumb ass GOP learn the language of the left they will always not ask the specific correct questions and get specific answers .
24 posted on
06/06/2013 9:49:43 AM PDT by
Para-Ord.45
(t ask the BIG question,)
To: Kristin; maggief; holdonnow; penelopesire; onyx; hoosiermama
This is truly shocking. But not surprising. He didn’t say No ..Never.
No wonder he’s not ready to leave. .
26 posted on
06/06/2013 9:50:27 AM PDT by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
To: PghBaldy
I'm not.
27 posted on
06/06/2013 9:50:35 AM PDT by
cableguymn
(The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
To: PghBaldy
Drudge has this headline photo. Is that a homo/sodomy marriage ring on his right hand?
28 posted on
06/06/2013 9:51:36 AM PDT by
newfreep
(Breitbart sent me...)
To: PghBaldy
Mark Kirk? He’s a rat mole... What would he be doing squeezing Holder?
Whew, is my spidey sense ever tingling.
I smell a diversion wrapped in a spin cycle and sprinkled with lies coming out of this hearing.
To: PghBaldy
Holder saying ‘there was no intention’ indicates to me it has happened and may be continuing to happen. If it has not, then Holder easily could have said so.
31 posted on
06/06/2013 9:52:33 AM PDT by
rawhide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson