Skip to comments.
Kirk to Holder: Is DOJ spying on Congress? (& SCOTUS?)
Washington Examiner ^
| June 6
| Joel Gehrke
Posted on 06/06/2013 9:34:44 AM PDT by PghBaldy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
I was STUNNED by his answer, and by Kirk asking the questions. WOW!!! I watched it live and was shocked it was not being covered.
1
posted on
06/06/2013 9:34:44 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
To: PghBaldy
The fact that Holder refused to say 'no' was the same as taking the 5th in my opinion.
Very shocking.
To: PghBaldy
Holder assured Kirk that there is no intention to do anything of that nature that is, to spy on Members of Congress or to spy on the Supreme Court.In other words, they are doing just that.
3
posted on
06/06/2013 9:38:10 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: PghBaldy
With all due respect, Senator, I dont think this is an appropriate setting for me to discuss [this issue],
Wow.
4
posted on
06/06/2013 9:38:16 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: PghBaldy
Of course they are - and clearly, they have the goods on Boehner, McCain, Graham, and their ilk.
5
posted on
06/06/2013 9:39:34 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
(CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
To: maggief
that is, to spy on Members of Congress or to spy on the “Supreme Court.
Why did he add the court? Roberts explained?
6
posted on
06/06/2013 9:40:20 AM PDT
by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Of course they are - and clearly, they have the goods on Boehner, McCain, Graham, and their ilk.Just like J. Edgar did. This is nothing new.
7
posted on
06/06/2013 9:41:11 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
To: PghBaldy
Weasel words from Holder. The short answer is clearly YES, or else why would he parse?
8
posted on
06/06/2013 9:42:11 AM PDT
by
Timber Rattler
(Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
To: Mr. Jeeves
9
posted on
06/06/2013 9:42:49 AM PDT
by
yorkiemom
To: PghBaldy
10
posted on
06/06/2013 9:42:53 AM PDT
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(President Obma; The Slumlord of the Rentseekers)
To: cripplecreek
Obama came to power through tough operations research on his political opponents. He was able to dig up dirt on in the sealed divorce records of a people who ran against him. Given the power of the FBI, and other intelligence gatherings agencies, why would it be crazy to think that he is not still doing spying on his opponents? In fact, it is logical to assume that he is.
11
posted on
06/06/2013 9:43:41 AM PDT
by
fhayek
To: PghBaldy
Did a Senator or House Rep. say there was a ‘bug’ in the cloakroom? I don’t think he was kidding. You can bet team 0bama was spying on John Roberts like crazy leading up to his 0bamacare decision. Probably got some incriminating bathhouse photos.
To: PghBaldy
Barrock, help, I need executive privelige again, fast.
13
posted on
06/06/2013 9:45:09 AM PDT
by
showme_the_Glory
(ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government)
To: PghBaldy
The answer was was meant to intimidate and to plant fear. Holder was saying that you, Congress and SCOTUS, are being watched and any information we have on you can be used any way we want.
14
posted on
06/06/2013 9:45:10 AM PDT
by
kabar
To: Timber Rattler
You hit the nail on the head.
DOJ and the Obama Administration are OUT OF CONTROL! They’re worse than a rabid pit bull.
15
posted on
06/06/2013 9:45:13 AM PDT
by
BCR #226
(02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
To: PghBaldy
The palace coup is upon is complete an nobody noticed.
To: PghBaldy
17
posted on
06/06/2013 9:46:37 AM PDT
by
txmissy
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
He did say words to that effect, but he is very new in office, and backtracked in same interview.
18
posted on
06/06/2013 9:46:47 AM PDT
by
PghBaldy
(12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
To: PghBaldy
We all know very well the Obozo and Holder ARE SPYING on both Congress and SCOTUS. We do not need proof - the very proof is in the Admin’s pattern of unaccountable behavior over the past 5 years, which has accelerated since the 2nd term commenced.
19
posted on
06/06/2013 9:47:15 AM PDT
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: PghBaldy
Holder assured Kirk that there is no intention to do anything of that nature He should have added *But if it happens, it happens*.
Carefully chosen weasel words and note, he used the word "is" and not was.
Interesting the choice of "is".
20
posted on
06/06/2013 9:47:23 AM PDT
by
The Cajun
(Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Ted Cruz, Trey Gowdy......Nuff said.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson