I don’t think your argument is with me. The evidence does not support the theory of evolution. A good scientist will then go back and examine their theory. The evidence points to God but they will not go there...................
If all the time and resources were spend on discovering the design instead of trying to prove there was not a design, think about how much further along we would be. Same for global warming. If all that time money effort could only be spent on solving real problems.
[[If all the time and resources were spend on discovering the design instead of trying to prove there was not a design, think about how much further along we would be.]
That’s a goodp oint- instead of cosntantly trying to discount that htere is design, tryign to discover how that design operates would open up the door to many discoveries one woudl think- It’s kinda l ike someone who desperately needs insulin and a vial of it sits right smack dab i nthe middele of hte table, but hte person states that it can’t possibly be insulin and frantically searches every place else for soemthign that is right in front of them-