Tactic- I’ll say it again- scientists gave thsoe FACTS- not me- so please refrain from FALSELY claiming i am spiouting dogma- if you can’t at least be the slightesdt bit honest in your ‘discussions’ then I must ask, what is your objkective? I ASKED YOU TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THOSE SCIENTISTS WERE WRONG AND all you come back with is what you just wrote? Apparently you aren’t goign to- so pleasse stop stalking thsoe who don’t beleive in evolution- I’ve watched your posts for many years now, and you NEVER offer ANY sort of evidence and simply attack thsoe who present arguments relentlessly dfespite their repeated requests that you refraIN from doing so and address the issues-
NOTHING I said was prostelizing- Everythign I mentioend is backed up by secular scientists- Hell- even this thread was a result of secular scientists who were baffled that what they foudn didn’t support their beleif- I asked you to address that topo and you refused- The only one makign a mockerty of science is you tactic- you Never offer anythign but petty little insults- you are liek a heckler cruising htreads looking for creationsits to attack- and quite frankly it;s gettign old
Then you need to find better "scientists".
I repaeat - the only way you can say definitively that something is impossible is to be able to understand the process well enough to demonstate what all the possible outcomes are, and prove that isn't one of them. Nobody has that kind of knowlege or understanding of the process. If they did, we wouldn't still be doing research.
What is it about that you can't understand?