Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

Tactic- I played your game a year ago- took me awhile- but I caught on- I did infact explain the FACTs- if you don’t wish to address them- the by all means don’t- but if you’re goign to play your little games here- forget about it

[[gravel, rocks, boulders, stones, cobble, water, strea, brook, creek, trees, forrest, woods, wilderness]]

Hmmm- hyou might wanna tell that to the scioentists that met at several meetigns over the yeasrs that came ot these same conclusiosn thenm- Bet they’ll get a good laugh too-

[[Neither you nor anyone else understands it well enough to be able to say that.]]

Lol- Still not goign to address the quesitosn with anythign credible eh? Oh well- whatever- As I said- since you don’tcare to discuss anythign other than saying “Nuh Uh”- then there’s no point discussing it further with you- If you insist on playign sillyl ittle games, I’ll oblige by returnign the favor


23 posted on 06/05/2013 11:21:13 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
You aren't "playing my game". My first rule is that you don't try to pass dogma off as "FACTs".

Your endless proseletizing masquerading as "science" does no service to religion or science. It makes a mockery of both.

24 posted on 06/05/2013 11:31:48 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson