The difference between you and I is that I am a Rebel and you are a Conformist.
I see stupid rules and I rebel against them and cheer on those who break them.
You see stupid rules and you submit to their authority and cheer on those who made them.
And that is fine, as long as you are willing see the consequences imposed. But if you argue for their to be no consequences for breaking rules, you are not a rebel, but an anarchist - definitely not a conservative.
If I see a rule that I believe I cannot morally or ethically follow, I will break the rule - but I will not whine when faced with the consequences.