Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MosesKnows

Only for taxes derived from income from what ever source.

A tax on most income is and was an indirect tax, not affected by the constitutional restriction on direct taxes.

The money already accumulated by John D. Rockefeller et al would not have been ‘income’ either. It would have been accumulated. Money gained from interest on that accumulation could have been taxed as income, and should be.


12 posted on 06/04/2013 1:58:06 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker
A tax on most income is and was an indirect tax, not affected by the constitutional restriction on direct taxes.

A federal boot lick defending the 16th amendment. How unexpected....

18 posted on 06/05/2013 10:10:57 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson