Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: barney10
RIGHT from Scalia's dissenting opinion...
*When there comes before us the taking of DNA from an arrestee for a traffic violation, the Court will predictably (and quite rightly) say, “We can find no significant difference between this case and King.” Make no mistake about it: As an entirely predictable consequence of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national DNA database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason." Maryland v. King (2013) No. 12–207, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Dissenting opinion)

106 posted on 06/06/2013 4:07:51 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: barney10

Still waiting for a reply to that...


107 posted on 06/10/2013 12:12:29 AM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson