To: Bloody Sam Roberts
I would have expected the opposite. The most liberal judges will always side with criminals not being identified.
5 posted on
06/03/2013 9:31:34 AM PDT by
aimhigh
(Guns do not kill people. Abortion kills people.)
To: aimhigh
The most liberal judges will always side with criminals not being identified. Using that viewpoint you are correct.
However, I am not a criminal and I will not allow my DNA to be taken even if I am arrested. That is my viewpoint. Or, are we once again, to give up a small piece of essential liberty in order to allow the state to supposedly keep us safer from criminals?
6 posted on
06/03/2013 9:36:38 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(For me, I plan to die standing as a free man rather than spend one second on my knees as a slave.)
To: aimhigh
The most liberal judges will always side with criminals not being identified.I guess "Secure in their persons" must mean something different to you.
9 posted on
06/03/2013 9:46:57 AM PDT by
NY.SS-Bar9
(Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
To: aimhigh
The most liberal judges will always side with criminals not being identified. Yes, because DNA is the only way to identify people who have been arrested.
Of course, in Maryland, as Scalia points out it takes months for the state to process DNA from arrestees. Which basically shoots a giant hole in that justification.
33 posted on
06/03/2013 12:59:34 PM PDT by
gdani
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson