Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: faithhopecharity

It’s sad that we have to deal with homosexuality at all. I will get flamed, but, things were easier when homosexuals were in the closet, and we didn’t have to deal with any of this.

Since the activities of scouting do not deal with sex identity or any of that, it’s unfortunate that the organization is now forced to deal with it. And, now that they allow openly gay scouts, pressures or lawsuits to force acceptance of openly homosexual leaders will happen. Count on it.


42 posted on 06/02/2013 3:09:45 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Understood.
there is a difference between “gay” boys in scouts, and
scouts as an organization openly approving or saying that “gay” behavior is just fine in scouting.

“gay” boys (to the extent any 12 or 13 year old kid knows he is really “gay?”) will always be in scouts..and that’s just fine with me.... but the organization as an organization... should still uphold basic moral standards ... and let’s remember that many parents put their boys into scouting to get some help in raising them properly.... (scouting can be particularly helpful for kids lacking a father at home for any reason, but scouting can help any boy grow up right).
I personally do not object at all to a “gay” boy in scouts. I do object to the official “teaching magisterium” of Boy Scouts of America telling the boys that “gay” conduct is fine, proper, acceptable, or wonderful with Scouting. Having “gay” boys in the organization and treating them equally, is right. Telling the boys that “gay” behavior is right, is terribly wrong for an “in loco parentis” mentoring organization that is supposed to be helping boys develop, mature, grow up


52 posted on 06/02/2013 3:22:34 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I will get flamed, but, things were easier when homosexuals were in the closet...

Yes, it was nicer then. I grew up in the 1940s and 1950s and I know that life was simpler when one didn't have sexual deviancy displayed before him all the time.

90 posted on 06/02/2013 4:49:56 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I don’t think that there’s anything wrong with what you said. There is going to be a negative reaction to all of this homosexual agitating and I believe that it will substantial and violent.

They ruin everything that they touch and it is no wonder why decent people desperately wish to be the hell away from them. It probably also speaks to why the dhimmicrats embrace them.


130 posted on 06/02/2013 8:51:50 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson