[Finny]

Unless I'm mistaken, the matchmaking service eHarmony.com was forced to include matchmaking for homosexuals. Disney Theme Parks are private organizations, but can you imagine the fireworks if they moved to prevent homosexuals from entering the parks on Gay Day? Disney Co. couldn't stop Gay Day even if it wanted to -- many here assume that it doesn't, but I expect that many in the company would love to put a halt to Gay Days but know better than to say so publicly. So instead, Disney withdraws and says, with genuine credibility, "Sorry, folks, there's nothing we can do about it."

No, I don't think the "but it's a private organization!" would prevent lawyers advocating the gay agenda from using anti-discrimination and civil rights arguments to sue said private organizations into the stone age.

[little jeremiah]

Because laws against “gay” sex acts were thrown out as unconstitutional (Lawrence vs Texas), that ushered in all the legal forcing of bakeries to make wedding cakes for perverts, bed and breakfasts being forced to rent bedrooms to perverts, wedding photographers and caterers to serve faggot “couples” - and all manner of private businesses and organizations to cater to surrender to fagdom, or pay giant legal fees and lose anyway.

That SCOTUS decision was among the worst they’ve ever made.

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

For whatever reason, Disney is probably the most gay-obsessed company in America. Wouldn’t surprise me if 30-40% of their employees are gay. But I get your point. Sad that today, ‘private’ in America is meaningless.