Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Strategerist

No, I think you are wrong there.
The boots on the ground are the guys that collaborate the doppler info.
Some come has to verify the technology.
Risky bushiness, but God Bless Them, they have saved thousands.


59 posted on 06/02/2013 10:25:33 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: mylife

Eh, I just have little tolerance for the fictions that people tell themselves to feel better.

The idea that storm “chasers” have saved thousands is extraordinarily dubious.

The vast majority of tornado warnings are based on radar, and this is even more true of the few EF3+ tornadoes that cause the overwhelming majority of deaths.

The main role chasers play now is preventing false alarms (i.e. if they don’t see a tornado, then the NWS will be less likely to issue a warning based on radar).

Note I’m distinguishing between chasers and spotters.

I submit that if there were no chasers of any kind for the last 20 years, the combination of radar and spotter networks would have resulted in about the same number of deaths prevented.

Again there are VERY few chasers doing legitimate science; a great many dress themselves up in scientific value because they’re too embarassed to admit (and they shouldn’t be) that they are doing it because they like to see tornadoes.


64 posted on 06/02/2013 10:37:51 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson