Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1
I believe I clearly said drug patents.

The constitution doesn't create or mandate a patent system. It only authorizes Congress to do so, if it chooses to. At first the range of patentable inventions was a lot narrower than it is now. Drugs were not always marketed under patent protection. The push to make drugs patentable came mostly from the makers of quack medicines.

107 posted on 05/31/2013 2:12:10 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: SeeSharp

Here’s a great piece on the history of pharmaceutical patents

http://www.lloydlibrary.org/scholar/Patents%20-%20V8%20-%20I1.pdf

And it points to Thalidomide as the reason compulsory licensing via the FDA was passed.

Patents are not the problem.


109 posted on 05/31/2013 2:40:38 PM PDT by Valpal1 (If the police canÂ’t solve a problem with brute force, theyÂ’ll find a way to fix it with brute forc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson