Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

george76 ~:” Contrary to its claims, the City of Chicago’s red light cameras are not based on safety, according to an Inspector General (IG) audit of the program that brought in more than $71 million in revenue for the city last year. “

I wonder how much of that money went to the city , and how much went to the opertors of the cameras.
In Florida , in order to collect more money , they shortened the timeing cycle of the lights by more than 1/2 second; resulting in more fines.
It also resulted in more ‘rear-end’ collisions by people who slammed on the brakes so they wouldn’t go through a yellow caution intersection .

Camera surveilled intersection = $50.00 ticket
Take it to court = additional court charges just to oppose ticket
The number of ‘rear-end’ collisions has gone up dramaticly


4 posted on 05/29/2013 10:02:58 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt (Untrustworthy people find it very difficult to believe that other men have honor. ~ David Codrea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tilted Irish Kilt
In Florida , in order to collect more money , they shortened the timeing cycle of the lights by more than 1/2 second; resulting in more fines.

One of the nearby cities to me, Oldsmar, FL, is smack dab in the middle of these shenanigans, and it's comical what's being done about it. Instead of using the small side road where the camera is located, people are cutting through the neighboring mall parking lot to get where they have to go. Traffic in the mall has gone up tenfold while the number of tickets they've issued from this particular camera have plummeted. They used this intersection, which happens to be right next to a mobile home park (read: elderly), as a test case to shorten the light cycles, and now the city is facing lawsuits from people being issued tickets for modifying their yellow light timers below the state required minimum.

Red light cameras are a bane and completely counter to the idea of "facing your accuser." I can't subpoena a camera to a court proceeding.

7 posted on 05/29/2013 10:38:32 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

I wonder how much of that money went to the city , and how much went to the opertors of the cameras.
***************************************
If the city made $71M ,, then the camera operator most likely got $284M ,, the cities usually get 20% ...


12 posted on 05/29/2013 12:32:27 PM PDT by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt
*** I wonder how much of that money went to the city , and how much went to the operators of the cameras.***

Well, if it's anything like the Parking Meter Contract that dumb Richie Daley signed, at the end of the day Chicago will owe money to the camera company. That $71 million will have a big minus sign in front of it.

14 posted on 05/29/2013 1:38:24 PM PDT by Condor51 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson