OF COURSE he went judge shopping.
ANYTHING to lower the esteem of the Article III Courts
and Justice in America to his level (breakin of Columbia,
burning alive of children at Waco, murder of everyone
through Fast&Furious, violations of
the 1st Amendment through perjury, and here
salient violations of the Rules.
No problem though.
Corrupt Holder and Obama can rule on themselves
from the positions they “won” through election fraud.
Before or after he recused himself.
I wondered about that in a previous thread. I also wondered what the judges thought about being “shopped”, or even if they knew. I wonder what they think now, as they should now know they were “shopped”.
This would do in a conservative.
Bingo! Holder perjured himself.
I’m actually quite surprised that H0lder didn’t already know who to go see to get his dirty deeds done dirt cheap.
I haven’t read the various DOJ pleadings (and don’t plan to even if they’re available online). From what I’ve seen for 2+ decades now, Judge Lamberth is not a dupe or crook; he’s always had an excellent reputation for fairness. Originally, IIRC, he was appointed by Reagan. If there’s fraud or corruption involved her, I’d place it at the feet of DOJ, not Judge Lamberth.
A party's appealing an adverse decision of a U.S. magistrate judge to a U.S. district court judge is not "judge shopping." It's how the system works.
In this instance, that there were two magistrate judges involved appears to have been inadvertent; a second magistrate had acted on the DOJ's "motion for clarification" of an earlier order, not realizing that the first magistrate had already done so.
The "judge shopping" allegation here is an ignorant canard.
I wish there was another country in this world that appreciated inherent rights.... Then i would go “country shopping”....
Maybe this is why we will colonize space... to escape tyrannical rules..... Much like the people who founded this country....
History will repeat itself....
Always... It is the law of universe...
What is sad about this is that the DOJ/Judge Lamberth meet was ex-parte. It did not include an attorney representing the other side.
Usually in ex-parte meetings, the judge is expected to step into the shoes of the absent attorney and test the application from that perspective.
Also, Lamberth has apologized for not posting the warrant on the court log in November 2012 as he was required to do.
No wonder it took Obama so long to catch on /lol
So impeach the judge too?
I don’t know what that judge was thinking.
I found it interesting that they used the female pronoun of “her”.
Is there another warrant for our esteemed ABC investigative reporter here?
Columbia University 1970! The black panther, armed criminal, and now....Attorney General of the United States.Holder lied to a Federal judge when he claimed James Rosen was a flight risk.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise. Thanks.
Two words: Presidential Pardon
no matter what.
Judges are reall nit wits for allowing themselves to become “ham sandwich” subpoena issuers.
The judges just rubber stamp whatever the prosecutor puts in front of them.
While we want to remove the evil clowns, it’s best we not embarrass our selves in the process. http://www.volokh.com/2013/05/28/notice-for-e-mail-warrants-and-the-james-rosen-case/
The racist coward Holder and mass murderer of women, children and babies at Waco went judge shopping for another coward like him. That’s not surprising.
What’s the SOB’s name?