Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArrogantBustard
He was neither senile nor on drugs ... he was a libertarian atheist (borderline anti-theist, IMO, certainly anti-religion) and it shows in his writing. In many respects, he seems to me to reject the idea of objective right and wrong. That is, with the usual libertarian atheist exception that belief in a supreme being or worship thereof is wrong.

RAH was a lifelong libertine, who mostly kept it out of his writing until Stranger in a Strange Land.

He was in poor health when he wrote I will fear no evil, and it was published with, I think, no editing. I read it when it was originally published in Galaxy magazine, and it was hard to get through. Wordy and tedious. His next novel was much better.

55 posted on 05/29/2013 10:59:58 AM PDT by Lee N. Field ("You keep using that verse, but I do not think it means what you think it means." --I. Montoya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Lee N. Field
RAH was a lifelong libertine, who mostly kept it out of his writing until Stranger in a Strange Land.

Yes, emphasis on "mostly" ... Revolt in 2100 was published in 1940 and pretty well shows his hand (Protestant fundamentalists itching to impose a theocracy).

56 posted on 05/29/2013 11:05:56 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson