To: Perdogg
I though DOJ had already explained that they had to keep the warrant secret because it involved not only past communications but also potentially years of future communications. Why would the notify Fox?
13 posted on
05/26/2013 7:29:33 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(No tag today.)
To: AZLiberty
14 posted on
05/26/2013 7:29:57 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(No tag today.)
To: AZLiberty
I thought the same thing!
This is confusing!
To: AZLiberty
I though DOJ had already explained that they had to keep the warrant secret because it involved not only past communications but also potentially years of future communications.
Why would the notify Fox?
+++++++++++
That’s my recollection as well. They got a judge to allow them to withhold the normal notification.
If so then there’s no story here. If not then it’s a big deal.
27 posted on
05/26/2013 7:51:27 PM PDT by
InterceptPoint
(If I had a tag line this is where you would find it)
To: AZLiberty
"I though DOJ had already explained that they had to keep the warrant secret because it involved not only past communications but also potentially years of future communications. Why would they notify Fox?"It was a "Top Secret" notification. They weren't allowed to tell Fox about it.
62 posted on
05/27/2013 5:56:39 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson