Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rome2000

[[despite the fact that Catholic officials were still discussing the issue at the time,]]

There shoudl have been no discussion at all- the church shoudl have realized that when a gay person takes an oath to ‘uphold the religious principles of God’ that they are LYING and therefore falsely takign an oath- period- the answer shoudl have been obvious from the start- what the heck was there to ‘discuss’?


22 posted on 05/26/2013 9:31:50 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
The answer should have been obvious from the start- what the heck was there to ‘discuss’?

I think they have to confer with Rome before releasing the official position.

I assure you the Catholics will not approve of it, and all of the Catholic Packs will soon be folding up shop.

The heretic cultist followers of the shyster Joseph Smith can have it all to themselves.

27 posted on 05/26/2013 9:37:23 AM PDT by Rome2000 (THE WASHINGTONIANS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE ARE THE ENEMY -ROTATE THE CAPITAL AMONGST THE STATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson