The same “scholar” who penned the article on his research that validated McCain as eligible also says the same for Cruz.
It is a debate the Libs are already salivating over and it will be an issue, but their hypocrisy in trying to make the technical point will also show their blind eye to their Messiah.
I am sick of libs just as many others but did you “sickoflibs” ever think by “trying” to make your point three times now, and I’m sure counting, that you are seen just as a silly yoot on a tantrum?
For those of us who respect Sarah, one of the reasons is she does not stab any benefactor to her rise in the back. It was not McCain’s biggest personal mistake to have run for the Presidency, but instead it was picking a running mate who would overshadow him by a mile. He asked her long before his moves back to the dark side which was again after the 2010 midterms, and she kept that promise.
I suppose you would have rather seen her for being just another politician who says one thing and does another. Additionally, you have not seen her at any McCain events since then now have you?
WTF??
I posted nothing but praise here for Cruz. I don't give a crap about the birther arguments against Cruz, they are as irrelevant as those wack-job birthers were here. They followed Trump of a cliff.
My pet peeve is the treasonous McCain. Ping me about him.