Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
It depends obviously on what are in the bills. They could pass a tough enforcement bill that includes securing the border, a system to track and deport visa overstays, and a mandatory e-verify system with tough penalties on employers who knowingly hire illegals.

They could pass a separate bill on guest workers, i.e., more slots for skilled labor. This would be a sop to the Chamber. I am dead set against it, but it would smoke out the Dems.

And if they want to be too clever by half, they could support a bill that legalizes the status of the illegals once all of the enforcement measures are in place for a number of years and shown to be operating and working effectively. This would be effective PR for the Reps. The public wants tougher enforcement so it would be difficult to attack by the Dems in the midterms. It could be called a "trust but verify" strategy recalling Reagan and his dealings with the Soviets.

122 posted on 05/23/2013 3:14:17 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]


To: kabar; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne
And if they want to be too clever by half, they could support a bill that legalizes the status of the illegals once all of the enforcement measures are in place for a number of years and shown to be operating and working effectively. This would be effective PR for the Reps. The public wants tougher enforcement so it would be difficult to attack by the Dems in the midterms. It could be called a "trust but verify" strategy recalling Reagan and his dealings with the Soviets.

"....legalizes the status of the illegals once all of the enforcement measures are in place for a number of years and shown to be operating and working effectively."

The phrase that comes to mind is "playing with fire." Every "comprehensive immigration" bill has something like that, and you see how well that has worked so far. Imagine the most extreme pro-amnesty interpretation about the "enforcement working effectively" that the 9th circuit, for example, could conjure up. Then Roberts or Kennedy could chicken out, or President Hillary (voters don't seem to hold Dems accountable now) could replace the older guys on the Scotus.

126 posted on 05/23/2013 3:51:42 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson