[topher]

People may remember Maloney the Baloney from the House Benghazi hearings recently.

New York City Democrat. Says it all. She is basically trying to prevent girls/women from getting the help they need when they are pregnant.

In essence, Maloney the Baloney wants to take away a girl's/woman's choice and make the person be forced to have an abortion. Adoption is not an option for Maloney the Baloney. Nor is economically helping a person who is preganant.

New York Democrat. Money should be given to the government and politicians like her...

[ghost of nixon]

Wow, CPC centers are a wonderful service to women in crisis. It is chilling to me that these Democrats see the act of encouraging these women to avoid aborting their un-born child as something to be stopped.

[Tax-chick]

... orders the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to create regulations restricting CPCs’ advertising practices. The wording of the bill is minimal, leaving the details to be hammered out by the bureaucracy at a later date.

This should be sufficient to get the bill thrown out. Even considering it is a waste of time, since, at the end of the long process, in all likelihood the result would be declared unconstitutional.

[Secret Agent Man]

they can’t stop abortion clinics closing because most , if not every one of them, is like Gosnell’s, give or take a bit.

so now democrats go after cisis pregnancy centers in the hopes they can take down christian-based, pro-life centers that help pregnant women.

you know why they are lying about these places?’’because they don’t say or do what the left says they say and do.’if they did, liberals would have evidence of it, just like pro-lifers have on every planned’parenthood,’saying they don’t do mammograms but the ppfa pres says on tv they do, and most of the pp’s hide rape of minors, and it’s all recorded. let’s hear the recordings that these places are tricking women to come in because they are told they will get abortion info and references. roll the tape, liberals.

[Neidermeyer]

Pro-Aborts have numerous 501c(3) tax exempt orgs that’s sole purpose is to solicit/gather funds and pay for abortions for “needy” women ,,, Why can’t we have a woman who wants to give birth apply for funds from one of these outfits and sue the sh*t out of them when they refuse to help... ,, just pick one with a name that implies help for women in crisis and force them to spend a few hundred thousand defending themselves.

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

Planned Parenthood trying to eliminate the competition. What’s not fascistic about this?

[Mother Mary]

>>“Stop Deceptive Advertising for Women’s Services Act,”<<

Since Planned Parenthood has nothing to do with parenthood, isn’t this Deceptive Advertising?