Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion; onyx; penelopesire

I found this link in one of the comments below the article. My apologies if this has already been posted - the rule was enacted about 10 days ago. But it seems to be pertinent to this thread. I just posted a little bit of it and dont have time to read the rest. Seems to be giving the President the power to put the Armed Forces to work on American soil to “support” local authorities.


I just found this post on another blog last night regarding putting local law enforcement under federal control:
VIGILANCE!!!
While we are focused on the scandals, LOOK WHAT THE OTHER HAND IS DOING!!!!

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-04-12/html/2013-07802.htm

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21826-21839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07802]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[DOD-2009-OS-0038; RIN 0790-AI54]

32 CFR Part 182

Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.


SUMMARY: This rule implements DoD regulations and legislation
concerning restriction on direct participation by DoD personnel. It
provides specific policy direction and assigns responsibilities with
respect to DoD support provided to Federal, State, and local civilian
law enforcement agencies, including responses to civil disturbances.

DATES: This rule is effective May 13, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tom LaCrosse, 571-256-8353.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 21827]]

Executive Summary

I. Purpose of the Regulatory Action

a. The purpose of this rule is to implement the statutory
requirements for the Department of Defense support of civilian law
enforcement agencies. This rule provides specific policy direction and
assigns responsibilities to Department of Defense key individuals
providing support to Federal, State, Tribal, and local law enforcement
agencies, including response to civil disturbances within the United
States, including the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any territory or possession of the
United States or any other political subdivision thereof.
b. The legal authority for this rule is 10 U.S.C. 375,
``Restriction on participation by Military Personnel.’’

II. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Rule

a. Support in Accordance With the Posse Comitatus Act
The primary restriction on DoD participation in civilian law
enforcement activities is the Posse Comitatus Act. It provides that
whoever willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse
comitatus or otherwise to execute U.S. laws, except in cases and under
circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of
Congress, shall be fined under title 18, U.S.C., or imprisoned not more
than two years, or both. Section 182.6 (a) describes in detail the
assistance that the Department of Defense may and may not provide
civilian law enforcement agencies.
b. Support During Civil Disturbances
The President is authorized by the Constitution and laws of the
United States to employ the Armed Forces of the United States to
suppress insurrections, rebellions, and domestic violence under various
conditions and circumstances. Planning and preparedness by the Federal
Government, including the Department of Defense, for civil disturbances
is important due to the potential severity of the consequences of such
events for the Nation and the population. The employment of Federal
military forces to control civil disturbances shall only occur in a
specified civil jurisdiction under specific circumstances as authorized
by the President, normally through issuance of an Executive order or
other Presidential directive authorizing and directing the Secretary of
Defense to provide for the restoration of law and order in a specific
State or locality.


115 posted on 05/22/2013 9:08:48 AM PDT by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: boxlunch

Thank you so much, boxlunch!!!

This is very disturbing, to say the least.


133 posted on 05/22/2013 10:21:52 AM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson