Posted on 05/21/2013 8:06:20 PM PDT by Nachum
From PuffHo:
“The Istanbul Process grew out of a resolution adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council in March and then by the U.N. General Assembly in November.
Resolutions in the previous 10 years had supported legal measures restricting the “defamation of religions.” The more recent Resolution 16/18, however, broke with that tradition by calling for concrete, positive measures to combat religious intolerance rather than legal measures that restrict speech.
“It is important that we recognize what we accomplished when this resolution ended 10 years of divisive debate where people were not listening to each other anymore. Now we are. We’re talking,” said Clinton.
The new resolution has faced criticism from conservatives who think it amounts to a concession to Islamic countries, and will result in the curtailing of any speech that is critical of Islam.
After Clinton’s speech, Andrea Lafferty, president of the Traditional Values Coalition, said her organization has been denied entrance to conferences and hotels for fear of “incitement to violence,” a phrase used in Resolution 16/18.
“We remain concerned about the use of that language,” Lafferty said.
Kozak tried to dispel her fears.
“That whole issue of incitement got debated a lot, and we were clear all along that what we meant by incitement was when ... the speech is part of an act,” he said. “It’s a very narrow concept.”
“Does the Istanbul Process have something to do with Benghazi? | The Daily Caller”
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/22/does-the-istanbul-process-have-something-to-do-with-benghazi/
Related topics are...........
Secretary Clinton Addresses Istanbul Process for Combating ...
Remarks at the Istanbul Process for Combating Intolerance and ...
NGO Documents to the Human Settlements / Istanbul Process
Remarks at Istanbul Process Meeting by Ambassador at Large for ...
U.S. Hosts Meeting on the Istanbul Process for Combating ...
The Istanbul Process, a Shameful State Department Initiative ...
Hell came out in support of the OIC’s ‘10 year plan’ there in Istanbul. See:
“The Istanbul Process”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/15/istanbul-process-clinton_n_1152508.html
Also see: http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/oic_10_year_plan.html
http://internationalopinion.com/id478.html
http://www.humanevents.com/2010/10/11/sharia-laws-threat-to-free-speech/
Thank you so much for the Ping.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
BUMP
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.