To: nickcarraway
You might keep in mind that the Gov’s in the Sandy case, inflated their $10B in damages to a $60B political payoff, and OK only asks for what it needs.
9 posted on
05/21/2013 12:52:34 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Darkness Hates the Light)
To: G Larry
These OK Senators voted against Sandy relief because it was a bloated bill filled with pork. Also, there was no Constitutional justification for the Federal government to make such expenditures, though national sentiment in such matters may demand it.
15 posted on
05/21/2013 12:58:11 PM PDT by
3Fingas
(Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
To: G Larry
You might keep in mind that the Gov’s in the Sandy case, inflated their $10B in damages to a $60B political payoff, and OK only asks for what it needs. It was actually congress who larded up the Sandy relief, adding money for a lot of non-Sandy related spending. Anyone who doesn't think this will also happen for any relief package for Oklahoma is only kidding themself.
To: G Larry
You might keep in mind that the Gov’s in the Sandy case, inflated their $10B in damages to a $60B political payoff, and OK only asks for what it needs. An inconvenient distinction which the presstitutes will do their best to ignore.
57 posted on
05/21/2013 1:49:27 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson