I must admit I should have read more closely the leading sentence in the article. I relied too much on the title (mistake).
“Harvard students, outraged over a doctoral dissertation arguing that Hispanic immigrants lack “raw cognitive ability or intelligence,” this week urged the university to investigate how the thesis came to be approved and to ban future research on racial superiority.”
—
It states that “Harvard students” were outraged.
That should have been an alarm bell. (and I am not prejudice about Harvard graduates, my son-in-law is a Harvard Law Graduate & is 1/2 Hispanic, the quickest study I have ever met and a stanch Republican.)
“It states that “Harvard students” were outraged.
That should have been an alarm bell. (and I am not prejudice about Harvard graduates, my son-in-law is a Harvard Law Graduate & is 1/2 Hispanic, the quickest study I have ever met and a stanch Republican.)
The faculty senate at Harvard’s Law School called an emergency meeting to assure such errors are not repeated.
“The Future must not belong to those Harvard Law School grads who deny Libtardism.” said the President of the Harvard Law School faculty senate.