Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Doesn’t Matter Where Obama was While Benghazi Happened, Says Obama Aide
Front Page Magazine ^ | 5-19-2013 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 05/19/2013 8:24:36 AM PDT by smoothsailing

May 19, 2013

It Doesn’t Matter Where Obama was While Benghazi Happened, Says Obama Aide

Daniel Greenfield

obama benghazi golf

Only crazy conspiracy theorists think that the Commander-in-Chief’s presence and attention count when an American diplomatic facility is under siege.

VIDEO

According to Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer, Obama’s whereabouts during the attack don’t matter. Oddly enough Bush taking the time to finish reading a children’s book to a class of nervous children did.

WALLACE: with all due respect, you didn’t answer my question. what did the president do that night?

PFEIFFER: kept up to date with the events as they were happening.

WALLACE: he didn’t talk to the secretary of state except for the one time when the first attack was over. he didn’t talk to the secretary of defense, he didn’t talk to chiefs. the chairman of the joint who was he talking to?

PFEIFFER: his national security staff, his national security council.

WALLACE: was he in the situation room?

PFEIFFER: he was kept up to date throughout the day.

WALLACE: do you know know whether he was in the situation room?

PFEIFFER: i don’t know what room he was in that night. that’s a largely irrelevant fact.

WALLACE: well –

PFEIFFER: the premise of your question, somehow there was something that could have been done differently, okay, that would have changed the outcome here. the accountability roof board has looked at this, people have looked at this. it’s a horrible tragedy, and we have to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

WALLCE: here’s the point, though, the ambassador goes missing, the first ambassador in more than 30 years is killed. four americans, including the ambassador, are killed. dozens of americans are in jeopardy. the president at 4:00 in the afternoon says to the chairman of the joint chiefs to deploy forces. no forces are deployed. where is he while all this is going on?

PFEIFFER: this has been tested to by –

WALLACE: well, no. no one knows where he is, who was involved, the –

PFEIFFER: the suggestion of your question that somehow the president –

WALLACE: i just want to know the answer.

PFEIFFER: the assertions from republicans that the president didn’t take action is offensive. there’s no evidence to support it.

WALLACE: i’m simply asking a question. where was he? what did he do? how did he respond in who told him you can’t deploy forces and what was his president?

PFEIFFER: the president was in the white house that day, kept up to date by his national security team, spoke to the joint chiefs of staff earlier, secretary of state, and as events unfolded he was kept up to date.

Tellingly Pfeiffer does not provide a single name.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; navyseals; threatmatrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: Chode
Adversity reveals character.


61 posted on 05/19/2013 1:38:16 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
or lack there of...
62 posted on 05/19/2013 2:00:07 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Thank you.


63 posted on 05/19/2013 3:37:50 PM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Where was Reggie Love??


64 posted on 05/19/2013 3:47:43 PM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Pfeiffer's responses tell us that they definitely don't want the public to know where the President was or what he was doing that evening.

The only logical conclusion that can be drawn, therefore, is that he was somewhere he shouldn't have been, doing something he shouldn't have been doing.

Yeah, this administration is "transparent". But not in the way they'd like us to think of them...

65 posted on 05/19/2013 4:20:49 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Ping!


66 posted on 05/19/2013 4:26:08 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It’s hard to sugar-coat, “He was asleep in his room.”


67 posted on 05/19/2013 4:27:37 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson