[DaveA37]

Is there anyting to the rumor that a fake kidnapping of our ambassador was planned and in exchange, some arab terroist being held by the U.S. would get our man back. When the kidnapping “plan” began, our security forces resisted, believing the embassy was under attack. Once the resistance began, all hell broke loose and people were being killed. Supossedly, it just plain got out of control (nothing unusual for this administration)....

Anyone know anything about that? Certaionly would be major blow to both Odumbo and Clinton’s future if it were true.

[DuncanWaring]

That's been suggested on more than one occasion.

See the tale of Lt. John Ezra Dahlquist.

[aknkate]

This is what I thought from the beginning. Why else would they give the stand down orders not once but twice? The White House would never think that anyone would put their lives on the line for someone else, if they were not ordered to do so, Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods spoiled their game.

Why was Stevens in Benghazi with no real protection? He was in on the game too, but these two brave men spoiled Obama’s plan.

Think about it weeks of “Save Stevens” banner headlines then just before the election “Our Hero” brings him home with is great skills.

http://www.thebrennerbrief.com/2013/05/06/was-benghazi-a-set-up-to-release-the-blind-sheik/

[abclily]

The faux kidnapping/exchange story came out soon after the Benghazi killings. It is the only scenario that makes ANY sense. Explains why the rescue teams were told to stand down. Obama thought he had it all arranged with Al Queda. Someone will step up and tell on Obama before this is over.

I wonder if Hillary was aware of the arrangement before the killings.