One thing that came out of the hearing the other day with Holder was an exchange with Chaffetz over an investigation of General Petraeus. Freeper Onyx summarized a few of the questions posed by Chaffetz here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3019843/posts?page=491#491
I could not listen to the hearing, but it sounds like there was an attempt to nail down some times about “what did they know and when did they know it.”
It would be impossible to say for sure, but the speculation that Petraeus might testify could be the additional “shoe” to drop in the Benghazi scandal suggested here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3019263/posts
There was some posting to that effect on the thread.
Petraeus is obviously the elephant in the room. The WH is locked in on assigning responsibility for the talking points to CIA. His testimony, in light of what we know today, is vital. I can’t find ant mention of additional hearings, beyond getting Pickering and Mullen to testify about the ARB, While I can understand this approach in challenging the credibility of State, I want substance on what happened on 9/11/12 especially from the military.
One thing I have not seen mentioned goes to the standard boilerplate that the Admin is using “...can’t comment because it’s under investigation”
In the 100 emails, it is stated that the FBI had no problem with the Talking Points 1.0. The CIA obviously has no problem with what they had composed. So, by process of elimination, that leaves only two entities who had a problem - The State Department and the White House.
Added keyword fivemyths