Nixon only had 1 scandal, this administration is a scandal a second as we at FR have dug up, and msm covered up!
Nixon left tracks. Evidence. Obama won’t do that. Without evidence, impeachment is a fantasy.
....WHO BUGGED CONGRESS?
Obama’s IRS locked out 500 conservative tea party groups out of contributing to the 2012 election . So democrats/socialists stole the Senate and the presidency by intimidating would be conservative donors and groups into not participating. Obama’s IRS denied conservatives the right to participate in the election and politics. and they stole the election to further damage America and its people
It’s all for show. We’ve been watching it for 5 years now and what has actually been DONE? Nothing.
Republicans and Democrats are like cheap old time fighters who, before the match, agree to dance around a bit and make it look good - and then they’ll split the purse.
That’s what’s going on in DC. Nothing will happen - other than talk, talk, talk.
I do wish people would stop maligning President Nixon by comparing him with this gang.
Obama and Holder must stop this before this Oval Office is stained forever. In fretting about the Tea Party and leaks to the press, the Obama who promised us unprecedented transparency is rendering an unprecedented display of paranoia and abridgement of freedom.Note, Dear Reader, that the Obama Administration - “liberals,” generally - are not “paranoid” about threats to the average American watching the end of the Boston Marathon or whatever. The defining characteristic of “liberals” is that they promote paranoia about “danger” from the people least likely to cause real trouble to the average American.“Gun control” is typical, in that the people who obey such a law are the people you know have no intention of murdering anyone. But it is true in general, that “liberals” are enthusiastic about the reach of officialdom, whereas conservatives always ask, “and after you pass your law, then what? Laws only affect the behavior of the law-abiding, and they’re not the problem in the first place.”
But of course, the foundational assumption of “liberalism” matches that of “objective journalism” - namely, that talk and criticism are more significant than reality. When you think about it, that conceit is a natural temptation to those whose business it is to talk, not to take concrete action. “Liberals” promote the same conceit that journalists do, either because they too are mere talkers, or because they want to get along with journalism and so the go along with journalism. And part of their reward for doing so is that journalists award them the positive labels “progressive” or “liberal.”
There are of course scarcely any actual conservatives to be found in America; “conservative” is a negative label because all Americans believe in progress. Those who are labeled “conservative,” for example, argue in favor of fuel mining and against the use of speculative fears of “global warming” to oppose progress.