[laweeks]

Baby A, Baby B, Baby C, Baby D . . . murdered ruthlessly before they even had a name . . . and I still wonder why the women who paid this filthy bastard to slaughter their children were not similarly charged as complicit in these murders.

Why were they not charged?

This bloody animal could not have brutally murdered these babies without "mommies'" permission. Seems as though they'd drag those worthless females into court too.

Everything's upside down in this horribly bloody drama!

[Morgana]

“Why were they not charged? “

Roe vs Wade is why.

Gosnell would not have been charged either had he killed them still en utero.

Until we overturn Roe vs Wade we can’t do anything to the mothers or abortion doctors who kill en utero.

We can however go after doctors who kill babies out side the uterus. That thanks to the Infants born alive law.