Corrected :
SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 < 7:28 pm EST or earlier EST [before 1:28 AM BENGHAZI TIME SEPTEMBER 12] : (WHITE HOUSE : OBAMA SPEAKS ON THE PHONE WITH NETANYAHU FOR ABOUT AN HOUR... [ACCORDING TO FREEPER “lack-of-trust “THE CALL WAS SUPPOSED TO BE EARLIER, AT 3 AM TEL AVIV TIME , BUT WAS LATE ])
SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 7:28 pm EST [1:28 AM BENGHAZI TIME SEPTEMBER 12] : (WHITE HOUSE : TIMESTAMPED PHOTO IS TAKEN OF OBAMA LISTENING TO MCDONOUGH SPEAK [NOT IN SITUATION ROOM] ...)
SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 ?after 5:15-20? PM EST ? [after 11:15 PM Benghazi time ] : (OBAMA PHONES NETANYAHU AFTER HAVING PREVIOUSLY BLOWN THE ISRAELI PM’S MEETING REQUESTS OFF?) To: riri He DID make time to phone up Netanyahu AFTER panetta’s visit though. Didn’t he? Lies and damn lies. Ain’t it odd? Biden was there. There are pics of it. Right in the THICK of Benghazi. WTF???
151 posted on Thursday, February 07, 2013 5:01:18 PM by MestaMachine | To 117
************
And they said Netanyahu never requested a meeting at the White House either.
22 posted on Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:02:50 PM by Rebelbase | To 1
***********
To: TBBT “There’s no intelligence indicating that the attack in Benghazi was premeditated.”
Of course there wasn’t. Obama REFUSED to take Netanyahu’s REPEATED requests for an hour long conference with Obama in the week leading up to the attacks. He likely had pertinent leads/credible reports from their very capable intelligence gatherers. In addition, Obama and his appointees have no intelligence. So, between these two facts, how could there be ‘any intelligence indicating’ that there was an impending attack???—————33 posted on Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:06:44 PM by nicmarlo