The rest of the screed involves charges of racism and bigotry:
There are many, many more examples of these "Limbaughisms" through the years. Looking at these comments makes you wonder why it took so long for advertisers to wake up and smell the bigotry.
The writer then compares him to Don Imus and says he'll never be the same to end his liberal fantasy.
The liberals are rejoicing in the comments. Have a look at this typical liberal comment:
Sadly for the Republican party, Rush Limbaugh (like Hannity, O'Reilly, Palin, Beck, etc.) epitomizes how radical the Republican party has become. All share an 1800's mentality which shockingly, people are gullible enough to believe. Most GOP politicians are too spineless to challenge the extremist viewpoints of these people, thus their viewpoints are now mainstream in the GOP. And they wonder why they are becoming known as "the party of stupid"?
1 posted on
05/14/2013 3:38:41 PM PDT by
Pinkbell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: Pinkbell
Dickey reported that Cumulus had lost millions of dollars in ad sales because many advertisers no longer want to be associated with Limbaugh. The pinklisting of conservative thought in the media continues.
Only blacklisting of known communists is "bad". Funny that.
To: Pinkbell
Sure Rush has a big audience and remains ahead of other talk radio hosts, but the advertisers who abandoned Rush appear to be on to something. Lost ad sales does not falsify or negate objective truth.
40 posted on
05/14/2013 4:20:43 PM PDT by
mjp
((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
To: Pinkbell
To: Pinkbell
Probably not. Most people who think conservatively have already heard Rush, and either like him or not. Those who are either liberals or low-information types who don’t read and research current events are not going to be persuaded even if they do listen to him. So no, Rush isn’t terribly relevant anymore. That’s not to say he should go away or that those who enjoy his commentary aren’t entitled to do so, but the question was “relevancy”.
42 posted on
05/14/2013 4:22:21 PM PDT by
bigbob
To: Pinkbell
Still relevant? Well it would seem that Osama Obama thinks he is.Otherwise,why would Osama mention Rush just about every day.Osama certainly doesn't mention *me* every day.Why,if I wasn't on his official “potential terrorist” list (as a military veteran) he wouldn't even know who I was.
To: Pinkbell
If he were not “still relevant” the question would not be asked.
44 posted on
05/14/2013 4:29:40 PM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
To: Pinkbell
I'd like to see Limbaugh with an hour-long weekend show on FOX News. He could replace bottom-feeding Geraldo Rivera.
45 posted on
05/14/2013 4:32:58 PM PDT by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: Pinkbell
No one in the media really is.
47 posted on
05/14/2013 5:19:16 PM PDT by
stuartcr
("I have habits that are older than the people telling me they're bad for me.")
To: Pinkbell
If the Most Powerful Man in the World is Thwarted by Me, What Does That Make Me?
To: Pinkbell
CNN can’t even get the facts right. CUME-Less is not the syndicator. EIB is distributed by Premiere Networks a division of Clear Channel.
Dickey is looking of his own programming alternative, for now it’s Rick Huckaby. CC will have no problem clearing Rush on one of their stations.
49 posted on
05/14/2013 5:52:40 PM PDT by
bleach
(If I agreed with you, we would both be wrong.)
To: Pinkbell
Is Dean Obeidallah a protege of Dr. Gosnell, the corporate murderer of CZAR B.O. and Planned Parenthood?
That seems to be his main concern for women's health!
To: Pinkbell
Who the H-E- Double Hockey Sticks is Dean Obeidallah?
54 posted on
05/14/2013 6:58:39 PM PDT by
JaguarXKE
(1973: Reporters investigate All the President's Men. 2013: Reporters ARE all the President's men)
To: Pinkbell
Rush makes thousands of interesting and valid points throught the year, but I wish he were harder on the “Republican leadership”, which is an oxymoron.
57 posted on
05/14/2013 8:35:49 PM PDT by
Theodore R.
("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
To: Pinkbell
Instead Limbaugh lashed out last week at young women again by asserting that the reason ad sales fell off was because: "The media buyers at advertising agencies are young women, fresh out of college-liberal feminists who hate conservatism." Not only is this comment sexist on its face, remarkably Dean, ol' buddy, ol' pal, it also happens to be true.
58 posted on
05/14/2013 8:47:25 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Pinkbell
If Rush is really irrelevant why does Obama claim that Rush is preventing him from accomplishing what he wants to?
60 posted on
05/15/2013 5:45:03 AM PDT by
NRA1995
(I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson