Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brad from Tennessee; everyone

Am a bit more than troubled by the meeting with the Turkish diplomat. The Turkish diplomat is allowed to leave the area before the attack begins. The Turkish diplomat appears to never have been in any danger. This speaks volumes in regard to a much deeper side to the Turkish diplomat. Wonder if there was an argument during the meeting between the diplomat and our Ambassador, or what would be the purpose of any meeting for a discussion. I realize weapon running has been proposed, as the reason for a meeting, yet if weapons running was the primary reason for the meeting why was the Turkish diplomat allowed to leave the area unscathed and our Ambassador was murdered? This question has given me more than a few sleepless nights and Brad am simply throwing this out. I don’t have the answer and realize you may not have the answer either.


99 posted on 05/13/2013 12:11:12 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: no-to-illegals
This is GQ’s lengthy take on Chris Stevens last days in Benghazi including meeting with the Turk.

http://www.gq.com/news-politics/newsmakers/201211/sean-flynn-j-christopher-stevens-benghazi-libya-ambassador

117 posted on 05/13/2013 9:25:34 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson