Posted on 05/12/2013 6:55:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
Hillary better thank her god, The Father of Lies, that she’s not a conservative like Sarah Palin, because if she were a conservative, after last week’s blistering testimony against her by the Benghazi whistle blowers, all news outlets, far and wide, would be yelling “off with conservative Hillary’s head”.
But not The Original, Leftist, Hillary.
Original Hillary gets a pass.
Yep, the numb-nuts that make up the ubiquitous fake news organizations gave scant to zero coverage of the testimonies that completely contradicted Mrs. Clinton’s account of the Benghazi Massacre. For instance, MSNBC gave no live coverage for the Benghazi hearings last week but gave Hillary a stonking five hours-plus for her scat-laden report back in January. How sweet.
By the way, didn’t a 1974 Hillary Clinton demand to know what Nixon knew and when he knew it regarding the Watergate break in? Yes, I believe she did. Google it for me, will you?
Oddly enough, Hillary has moved from that inquisitive footing to the 2013 posture of a “what difference does it make?” maiden when it comes to the compost in which her tall-tale is ensconced.
Madame Secretary, the difference that it makes is great, primarily to grieving friends and relatives of the abandoned American ambassador, Chris Stevens, the information officer Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. It also makes a difference to America, especially if you lied your backside off to us in a sick and twisted cover up. That’s what difference it makes, you calloused woman. Vive la difference.
So, what did the rest of the world learn that the likes of MSNBC and CNN see as a non-story? PJMedia’s Bryan Preston summed it up succinctly with these seven salient points. Please forward this to the dill weeds working the lame stream media’s important stuff section.
1. There were multiple stand-down orders, not just one. Oh, do tell these daft propagandists that military personnel were furious when they were given the orders to “stand down” and not protect our consulate. Thank you.
2. Ambassador Stevens’ reason for going to Benghazi has been cleared up.
3. Clinton was briefed at 2 am on the night of the attack, was never told that a movie had anything to do with the attack by those on the ground in Libya, yet she blamed the movie anyway.
4. Whistle-blowers were intimidated into silence.
5. “The YouTube movie was a non-event in Libya.”
6. Democrats were uninterested in getting at most of the facts, but were very interested in destroying Mark Thompson.
7. House hearings are a poor way to determine who did what and why during and after the attack.
Also, please let them know that the White House’s Benghazi talking points underwent twelve revisions and were scrubbed of any terror references. They might wanna note that.
Even with all the above, I still fear that Miss Hillary will skate away unscathed. However, there is a vestige of hope, albeit it is a small one, that people on both sides of the political aisle are finally getting pig sick of any and all prostitutes, I mean politicians, who will lie to our face.
Benghazi Gate.
She will NOT get away with it... I know there are many dejected defeatists that believe that all of these people are all above justice but justice grinds slowly... and oh so finely.
LLS
And that was the blood from Vince Foster who had NO blood on his from killing himself with his own gun!!!
BTW he had a gun???
So, inaccuracy from an author who is too lazy to do his own fact checking is just peachy with you as long as he is writing stuff you agree with?
Yeah, Hillary demanded to know what ‘Bush Knew’ and when he knew it re: Sept 11th 2001.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IqYEP1Ys5Ug#!
Hillary: “The American people need to get the facts”
4. Whistle-blowers were intimidated into silence.
5. “The YouTube movie was a non-event in Libya.”
And the American press sucks...
The blood of the men in Benghazi are on Hillary’s hands... on the hands of her trolls too.
Country Joe is still around.
Saw something about him just a few months ago.
love to see him create something on this.
Dennis Kucinich is now saying the talking points were politically scrubbed.
Among the crap the nutjob left is posting on twitter. They’re clearly mostly concerned about protecting Clinton.
#BenghaziInFourWords GOP Paid For Incident
#BenghaziInFourWords Throwing dirt on Hillary
#benghaziinfourwords move on sore losers; no it’s not watergate; Ollie North shouldn’t comment; Issa is a mess;”
#benghaziinfourwords GOP > CUT MILLIONS IN SECURITY
#benghaziinfourwords Fear of Hillary 2016
#benghaziinfourwords Hang something on Hillary. Or Hang something on Obama. Nothing but a witchhunt.
Stymied GOP manufactures controversy. #benghaziinfourwords
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/where.htm
http://www.gonavy.jp/CVLocation.html
Hard to tell locations on 11SEP12, but I believe that we did not have a CVN in the MED at that time.
Many, especially those behind the scenes, have waited a long time to hear someone in power say something like that to that horrid creature. It appears that their prayers will soon be answered.
I liked hearing Rand Paul say he would have fired her, but I will enjoy even more her finally facing some public justice for the crimes she is guilty of.
Is the Clinton Body Count a family hobby? What's her tally up to now? Verifieds? Probables? Shared?
I'd say its less than a small one.
The democrat party is corrupt beyond all redemption, and the GOP is not far behind.
Even Bill Clinton voiced the famous words, “Where are the carriers?”....the first words uttered when SHTF somewhere in the world.
Alternate ending:
” Hillary Could Eat Kittens While Stomping on a Naked Granny and the “Media”... would claim it was just a celebrity episode of FEAR FACTOR.”
While you are correct about who first said that, Howard Baker, I vaguely remember a story where that memorable question was attributed to Hillary when she ran for Senator by a MSM reporter. The context was “how brilliant” Hillary was. I further remember that Hillary did not correct the record although she clearly had first-hand knowledge of who said that. She has a history of taking credit for things she didn’t do when it benefits her or pads her resume.
Accuracy counts for right minded Americans, but the left gets away with twisting the truth to fit their own aims almost every time. I remember several people pointing this out here although I won’t take the time to look for it on this special day for my wife. These things stick in our minds and it is a prime example of how so much of our history has been hijacked by the left.
Watergate was the most memorable example for many of us where the media furthered an agenda through “great journalism.” However, history clearly shows the same media expressed indifference and outright ignored the philandering behavior of Camelot that may have compromised national security. Go figure! If the truth counted, the media would have given each scandal equal scrutiny.
Giles is claiming she did that in 1974, with regard to Nixon. So, your comment is irrelevant to the discussion.
It was Hillary who wanted to deprive Nixon of his ability to have a lawyer
It’s about time to give her the Nobel Peace Prize for her great work saving lives in a violent area.
Errors like that simply give liberals a valid excuse to dismiss the entire set of points being made.
We should make liberals waste their time looking for them (if they can indeed find them) rather than handing them to them on a silver platter as Doug Giles did there.
I usually like Doug Giles, and was simply figuring that he was making a sarcastic point that I wasn’t picking up on. Otherwise, it would be egregious.
True, but also irrelevant to the point that Giles played loose with the facts in a piece published by Town Hall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.