Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluetick

This was the circumstances behind Derbyshire’s firing for those who don’t know...

In April 2012, Derbyshire wrote an article for Taki’s Magazine titled “The Talk: Nonblack Version.” The article was a response to reports in the news media of ‘talks’ given by African-American parents to their children warning them against white people.

The article, which he couched in terms of purported advice he had given his own children on dealing with African Americans, describes 5% of black people as “ferociously hostile” to whites. He then advises his readers to avoid settling in black neighborhoods, avoid events that draw large numbers of black people, and refrain from helping black people who seem to be in distress.

He also advises white readers to scrutinize black politicians more heavily than white ones, to cultivate friendships with the handful of “intelligent and well socialized blacks” for reasons of public relations, and argued that the average intelligence of black people is lower than that of white people.

Derbyshire’s column immediately provoked condemnation from across the political spectrum. Derbyshire’s editor at the conservative publication National Review, Rich Lowry, described the piece as “appalling.”

On April 7, Lowry announced that Derbyshire had been dismissed from National Review.

“We never would have published it, but the main reason that people noticed it is that it is by a National Review writer. Derb is effectively using our name to get more oxygen for views with which we’d never associate ourselves otherwise. So there has to be a parting of the ways.”

In response to the commentary provoked by his piece, Derbyshire wrote a more extensive explanation of the points made in the article on his home page.

READ IT HERE:

http://www.johnderbyshire.com/April2012/page.html


12 posted on 05/11/2013 10:43:58 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
NR had no problem with a contributor who violated fundamental tenets of conservatism, but … they do have a problem with a contributor who violates fundamental tenets of liberalism.

A treasure-trove of wonderful one-liners.

13 posted on 05/11/2013 11:11:02 AM PDT by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson