Posted on 05/10/2013 2:19:00 PM PDT by neverdem
Why in hell should a gun owner identify themselves to a corrupt, unConstitutional, gun-grabbing regime?
My wife is getting her carry permit here in MA. Now I have to be nice to her.
There are exactly TWO Illinois State Troopers assigned to processing FOID card applications and renewals.
FOID? FOAD!
There’s no place like home. The State of Illusion is sick, but I know several people who never had FOIDs and are now getting them.
It’s a start.
If you want off or on this Illinois list please FReepmail me. Neverdem has asked me to maintain an Illinois ping-list and it may be a good idea so that we can organize and act promptly on issues of interest and importance.
And pay for it to boot!
Another reason for going to Constitutional Carry. Government is not our friend.
So if you get 60 days advance notice to renew your card and it takes 90 days to get the card, are you in violation of Illinois law to own a gun during the gap and subject to state reprisal (prosecution)?
It has been a month since I sent my app in. One of my co-workers told me to expect to wait at least another month..
I have no idea. I’m far away.
If state law specifies that the state is required to issue the card within 30 days of receiving a valid application, then although the statute does not specify a specific penalty for the state's failure to issue the card in timely fashion, the fact that an individual does not have a current FOID card on their possession would be purely a consequence of the state's unlawful failure to supply it. As such, prosecuting someone for the state's unlawful activity would constitute entrapment. That's not to say the state wouldn't try it and impose considerably legal expenses upon its victims, but that wouldn't make the state's actions even remotely valid even outside the RKBA issues.
Another thing to note is that unless things have changed, the statutes that require a FOID to acquire firearm or ammunition, or to transport an assembled firearm on a public right of way, specify that the FOID has to be current and unexpired, but, the statute that requires a FOID to possess a firearm on one's own property merely specifies that the FOID must have been previously issued by the Illinois State Police. Under an honest reading of the statutes, someone whose FOID expires would--unless or until it is renewed--not be allowed to purchase firearms or ammunition, nor transport firearms that were assembled, but would not be committing any crime merely by having the firearms on his own property, or by transporting them in a broken-down (disassembled) condition.
Oddly enough, if the Republicans in Illinois can continue to block a new bill, come June 9th, there will be gun freedom in Illinois. Hopefully there are private gun dealers just outside the state borders ready to rush in and sell guns and ammunition like there is no tomorrow.
Literally a situation where “price is no obstacle”.
Sell a .38 special and 50 rounds for a thousand dollars. The fashionable Glock .40 and a hundred rounds for five thousand dollars.
Oddly enough, the longstanding nickname for people from Illinois is “suckers”. So this should properly be called:
“THE SUCKER GOLD RUSH”.
LOL!
In the corrupt, unConstitutional, gun-grabbing regime State of Chicagoland residents can't even buy ammo without a FOID card.
A few years ago nonresidents could buy ammo without a FOID card, but why feed the beast.
Technically, yes you are. Mayor Daley had the State Police notify the Chicago PD when a city resident FOID expired. They then got a knock on the door asking for their firearms.
A message to the few remaining conservatives in IL: take your state back. Ignore your state’s laws, they are not constitutional. Start killing the bastards that control the tyranny.
Where in the SECOND AMMENDMENT does it say you have to have a freaking FOID card???????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.