“Nuland objected to naming the terrorist groups because “we don’t want to prejudiced the investigation”.
Does that sound like they are going to say they altered the pages to protect the investigation? Is cbs helping them?
So letting them blame a video isn’t prejudicing the investigation, oh, yes it is, but in another direction, remember our military and administration and government agencies have been infiltrated by Muslims and Muslim sympathizers, you wont hear that at any hearing.
Rush led with this: that ABC’s Jonathan Karl is reporting that the administration lied about the talking points. They have been claiming that the tp underwent very minor, very limited rewrite. Instead, it’s now reported in the LSM that after TWELVE rewrites, the final version had removed ALL reference to terrorism, to al qaida, to ansar al sharia, and to the early CIA warnings about terror threats that everybody knew about.
Rush is distilling the new info out there down into that kernel, that nugget: Administration knowingly lied about the talking points.
What you two are focusing on is worthy, no doubt. But no matter what these people try to say was their reason for altering the talking points, at the top level of the administration they lied by claiming very little was done to the original version.