That's a whole lot of nonsense you've written. Of course, it's obvious that you're overdoing it hoping you intimidate your way out of a lost point. And to this specific point you now claim: BULL****. The Minor court EXCLUSIVELY characterized the children born in the country of citizens are natural-born citizens. What other reason does it serve to say ANYTHING about being born to citizen parents?? The only other option for citizenship at birth is through the 14th amendment and the court has already said that it does NOT define natural-born citizenship. There are no other criteria that fits. Otherwise, the court should have accepted Virginia Minor's argument, but they didn't. And the definition that the Minor court is a verbatim match of the Law of Nations definition cited by Marshall in the Venus. That's not by accident. And sorry, but the Bayard book is meaningless because we have a UNANIMOUS Supreme Court decision in Minor that tells EXACTLY what constitutes the term natural-born citizen.
Of course this has been talked about now for the last couple of years.
And of course it’s bull****. It’s OBVIOUS bull****, and there’s not a single person who matters in the entire world who believes it.
In fact, a court specifically ruled that Minor DOES NOT SAY what idiot birthers claim it says.
It’s wrong on so many different levels, there’s no accurate way to characterize it other than calling it bull****.