Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
I do recall it now that you mentioned it, but the doings of the courts and the various challenges in the courts hold little interest for me. I have argued repeatedly that it was a mistake to proceed with this sort of stuff when the battleground had not been softened up first.

I *Knew* the courts were going to worship the "Wong" precedent, and reasoning with them was going to be a waste of time.

I advocated following the same strategy as the NRA. Plant small seeds, look for favorable jurisdictions, file plausible pleas (such as a signed statement by Nancy Pelosi is inadequate proof.) and work to change the courts and the narrative.

The Courts have long been a pursuit of politics by other means. It is a fiction that they are concerned with the law above all else. Most of them are just petty dictators applying their own subjective whims.

262 posted on 05/13/2013 7:11:16 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

To paraphrase Sir Winston Churchill:
“[the judiciary] is the worst method of resolving disputes, except for all those other methods that have been tried from time to time.”


263 posted on 05/13/2013 7:29:11 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson