You are either extraordinarily obtuse, or deliberately misleading. The act says "Shall be considered as" it does not say "is."
That is the FIRST point upon which you are absolutely wrong.
The Second point upon which you are absolutely wrong is the intentional omission of the fact that a resident American Father was required to make it work. A foreign Father was an absolute deal killer.
The Third point upon which you are absolutely wrong, is the failure of you to note that those specific words were repealed five years later, as if congress explicitly acknowledged that the earlier act was a mistake.
Three strikes and YOU'RE OUT!
