[DiogenesLamp]

Wong’s been cited in subsequent cases more than 1000 times and the holding has never been challenged in 115 years. That’s a pretty good track record.

We aren't going to get over this "numbers thing" with you, are we?

Pray tell, how many authorities pronounced the Earth as the center of the Universe prior to Galileo? Were they right?

How many courts have upheld Abortion "rights"? Were they right?

[Jeff Winston]

Pray tell, how many authorities pronounced the Earth as the center of the Universe prior to Galileo? Were they right?

So you're "right," just because every real authority says you're full of crap?

Talk about your logical fallacy.

[Nero Germanicus]

The Wong holding stands until and unless it is overturned. Obviously it continues to make good sense to contemporary era Triers of Fact, without exception. Republicans and Democrats have cited Wong as binding precedent; like the Republican Attorney General of Indiana in Ankeny v. Daniels or Obama’s Democrat attorney in Georgia who cited Wong in his brief but then nearly blew his case by getting indignant like a two year old and refusing to show up for trial.

You sure do like your non-sequiturs, Galileo, Roe and Wong Kim Ark, huh?
Wow.